
Design QA + Peer Review for
Permit-Ready CDs
Catch coordination gaps, scope misses, and constructability issues before they become RFIs, change orders, or permitting delays. We deliver concise markups, a prioritized anomaly list, and a final-submission checklist your team can run.
Reduce rework by catching issues before the set leaves your desk
Streamline revisions with a clear, prioritized punch list
Improve constructability and coordination clarity across disciplines
Built for full sets or targeted
discipline checks.
WHAT WE REVIEW
We can review an entire CD package or focus on the disciplines causing the most churn.
-
Full CD Peer Review (architectural + MEP + structural coordination lens)
-
Discipline-Specific Review
-
Architectural
-
Interiors
-
MEP (coordination/clarity focus)
-
Structural (coordination/clarity focus)
-
-
Pre-Permit “Final Pass” (fast review right before submission)
-
Revision Review (confirm changes addressed + no new conflicts introduced)

DETAILS
Permit-ready peer reviews that reduce RFIs, rework, and coordination misses—markups, anomaly lists, and submission checklists.
Deliverables your team can act on immediately.
-
Marked-up set (PDF markups with clear callouts)
-
Prioritized anomaly list (Severity 1/2/3 with recommended actions)
-
Coordination / constructability flags (where the field will stumble)
-
Submission-ready checklist (your “final pass” workflow)
-
30-minute review handoff call (walkthrough + answer questions)
Optional add-on:
-
Custom workflow installation: we turn the checklist into your repeatable internal QA step (for future sets).
-
Step 1 — Intake
You send the current set (PDF) + project basics (use, delivery method, key constraints, known problem areas).
Step 2 — Review + Markup
We review with a coordination + constructability lens and produce markups + anomaly list.
Step 3 — Handoff + Close
We deliver a concise action list and walk your team through what matters most.
Turnaround:
-
Standard: 3–5 business days
-
Rush: 48–72 hours (as available)
-
Package A — Final Pass Review
Best for: teams heading to permit and wanting a disciplined last check.
Includes:-
Markup pass + prioritized anomaly list
-
Submission checklist
-
30-minute handoff call
Package B — Full Peer Review
Best for: full CDs where coordination clarity and constructability matter.
Includes:-
Deeper markup + cross-discipline coordination flags
-
Prioritized anomaly list with recommended actions
-
Submission checklist + coordination checklist
-
60-minute handoff call
Package C — Workflow + QA System Install
Best for: firms who want repeatable QA that improves every future set.
Includes everything in Full Peer Review, plus:-
Custom QA checklist + revision workflow
-
Standards for internal redlines and coordination tracking
-
Team training session + rollout guidance
-
What this is—and what it isn’t.
-
We are not the Engineer/Architect of Record and we do not provide stamping.
-
This is a quality + coordination + constructability peer review to improve clarity and reduce downstream churn.
-
We focus on issues that create RFIs, rework, permitting friction, and field confusion.
Optional (production support positioning):
Overflow Production Support
For teams needing additional drafting capacity, we can support architectural drafting or steel modeling/detail support under your direction and standards.-
Do you stamp drawings or replace the EOR/AOR?
No. We provide peer review, QA, and constructability/coordination feedback. Stamping remains with the EOR/AOR.
What format do you need?
PDF is fine for review and markup. If we’re supporting workflow installation, we’ll align to your standards.
Can you review only one discipline?
Yes. We can review architectural, interiors, MEP coordination/clarity, or structural coordination/clarity as standalone scopes.
Is this a constructability review?
Yes—constructability and coordination are core to our review lens, with a focus on preventing RFIs, rework, and field confusion.
Can you do a fast pre-permit pass?
Yes. We offer a final pass review with standard or rush turnaround depending on the schedule.
What does success look like?
Fewer coordination misses, cleaner permitting submissions, fewer RFIs, fewer “interpretation” issues in the field, and a tighter revision process.